Skip to main content
. 2022 May 8;31(7):1491–1505. doi: 10.1002/hec.4523

TABLE A2.

Robustness check for Difference‐in‐differences Estimates: Excluding a 3 week window pre and post week 11

Main effects Call resolution
Calls First‐time callers Resolved Prescription Follow‐ up Referral
Post × Year2020 2.465*** 2.106*** 2.504*** 3.337*** 3.217*** 1.930***
(0.074) (0.080) (0.078) (0.122) (0.128) (0.117)
Week F.E Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Day of week F.E Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Observations 616 616 616 616 616 616
Adjusted R 2 0.971 0.952 0.967 0.958 0.944 0.912
Average before week 11 2020 30.58 18.42 19.28 5.77 2.52 3.56

Note: As a robustness test by excluding 3 weeks before and after week 11. Each column presents the results of the difference‐in‐differences specification for a different dependent variable, estimating θ in Equation (2) using ordinary least squares. The dependent variables used in these models are (from left to right): log (number of calls), log (number of first‐time callers), log (number of resolved calls), log (number of calls resulting in prescription), log (number of follow‐up calls + 1), and log (number of referrals + 1). All models include week fixed effects (F.E.) and day‐of‐the‐week fixed effects (F.E.). The last line shows the average of the dependent variable in levels (i.e., not in logs) before the implementation of the mobility restrictions. * statistically significant at 10%, ** at 5%, *** and at 1%.