Table 2. Relationship Between Changes in Thermic Effect of Food and the First Predictive Component as Evaluated by the OPLS Model.
Variable | OPLS predictive component | Multiple regression | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component loadinga | t Statistic | Rb | P value for R | Regression coefficient | t Statistic | |
Matrix X | ||||||
Baseline BMI | 0.191 | 2.46 | 0.209 | <.05 | −0.015 | −0.33 |
Baseline fat mass | 0.256 | 2.89 | 0.283 | <.05 | −0.014 | −0.28 |
Baseline TEF | −0.850 | −11.96 | −0.938 | .005 | −0.505 | −5.69c |
Change in PREDIM | 0.324 | 2.41 | 0.359 | <.05 | 0.105 | 1.37 |
Change in fat mass | −0.271 | −2.59 | −0.301 | <.05 | −0.122 | −1.55 |
Matrix Y | ||||||
Change in TEF | 1.000 | 5.27 | 0.540 | .003 | NA | NA |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; NA, not applicable; OPLS, orthogonal projections to latent structure; PREDIM, predicted insulin sensitivity index; TEF, thermic effect of food.
The explained variability was 29.2% (24.3% after cross-validation).
Component loadings expressed as a correlation coefficients with predictive component.