Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 22;39(8):1201–1206. doi: 10.1007/s10571-019-00714-3

Table 2.

Logistic regression analyses of the association between TMAO levels and clinical outcomes

OR (95% CI) for 3-month unfavorable functional outcome P value OR (95% CI) for 3-month mortality P value
Unadjusted model
 TMAO level
  First quartile Reference Reference
  Second quartile 1.56 (0.73–3.33) 0.250 1.60 (0.53–4.83) 0.408
  Third quartile 2.78 (1.29–5.98) 0.009 2.52 (0.88–7.20) 0.084
  Fourth quartile 3.09 (1.43– 6.65) 0.004 5.64 (2.08–15.30) 0.001
Adjusted model
 TMAO level
  First quartile Reference Reference
  Second quartile 2.01 (0.79–5.11) 0.143 1.43 (0.34–6.05) 0.627
  Third quartile 2.65 (0.96–7.34) 0.061 1.89 (0.48–7.39) 0.320
  Fourth quartile 3.63 (1.34–9.82) 0.011 4.27 (1.07– 17.07) 0.040

The multivariate model was adjusted for demographic characteristics, hypertension, coronary heart disease, body mass index, NIHSS score, DWI-ASPECT score 0–7, stroke subtypes, and homocysteine and low-density lipoprotein levels