Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2005 Jul;79(13):8182–8188. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.13.8182-8188.2005

Development of a Novel System To Study Hepatitis Delta Virus Genome Replication

Jinhong Chang 1, Severin O Gudima 1, Chi Tarn 1, Xingcao Nie 1, John M Taylor 1,*
PMCID: PMC1143748  PMID: 15956563

Abstract

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) genome replication requires the virus-encoded small delta protein (δAg). During replication, nucleotide sequence changes accumulate on the HDV RNA, leading to the translation of δAg species that are nonfunctional or even inhibitory. A replication system was devised where all δAg was conditionally provided from a separate and unchanging source. A line of human embryonic kidney cells was stably transfected with a single copy of cDNA encoding small δAg, with expression under tetracycline (TET) control. Next, HDV genome replication was initiated in these cells by transfection with a mutated RNA unable to express δAg. Thus, replication of this RNA was under control of the TET-inducible δAg. In the absence of TET, there was sufficient δAg to allow a low level of HDV replication that could be maintained for at least 1 year. When TET was added, both δAg and genomic RNA increased dramatically within 2 days. With clones of such cells, designated 293-HDV, the burst of HDV RNA replication interfered with cell cycling. Within 2 days, there was a fivefold enhancement of G1/G0 cells relative to both S and G2/M cells, and by 6 days, there was extensive cell detachment and death. These findings and those of other studies that are under way demonstrate the potential applications of this experimental system.


Natural infections with hepatitis delta virus (HDV) are always associated with the presence of the helper virus, be it the natural helper virus, hepatitis B virus, or, in the case of experimental infections of woodchucks, woodchuck hepatitis virus (10). The basis for this dependence is that the envelope proteins of the hepadnavirus are required for both HDV entry into hepatocytes and the assembly of new HDV particles. Consistent with this interpretation, HDV is also able to infect primary cultures of primate and woodchuck hepatocytes. Once inside a susceptible cell, the small 1,679-nucleotide single-stranded circular RNA genome of HDV can achieve genome replication by RNA-directed RNA synthesis using redirection of a host RNA polymerase, probably PolII (25). During this replication, the antigenome, an exact complement of the genome, is produced as well as a smaller 800-nucleotide 5′-capped and 3′-polyadenylated RNA that acts as mRNA for the translation of a 195-amino-acid species, the small delta protein, δAg. This δAg is absolutely essential for HDV genome replication (5). It may be multifunctional since several different abilities have already been ascribed to it (20).

It is possible to study HDV genome replication in cultured cell lines in the absence of the helper hepadnavirus. For example, replication is initiated when cells are transfected with a cDNA version of the HDV sequence (5). Transfection with just HDV RNA sequences is usually not successful, since the replication has an early need for the essential δAg (11). However, this need can be met if the cells are already expressing δAg or if δAg is cotransfected with the RNA (7, 11). In addition, the need can be met by cotransfecting the HDV RNA along with an mRNA for δAg (21).

During both infection and transfections, it has been found that HDV RNAs with numerous nucleotide changes accumulate (13, 22). In particular, there is a specific change that arises via RNA editing acting at a site corresponding to the amber termination codon for δAg (19). This editing is carried out by ADAR-1, a member of a family of adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (2, 27). The specific change on HDV allows the translation of a longer form of δAg. This large δAg is known to have two functions. First, it acts as a dominant negative inhibitor of genome replication as supported by the small δAg (5). Second, this large δAg has the unique ability, in the presence of the hepadnavirus envelope proteins, to drive the assembly of HDV genome RNA and to produce new virus particles (3). In addition to this specific editing change, there are additional changes that accumulate during replication to produce altered δAg species that are not supportive of genome replication and thus contribute to a general decline in replication (1, 13, 22, 25). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop a system in which HDV genome replication could be studied under conditions where the small δAg was provided solely from an inducible source. Here, we describe the development of this novel system and some of its properties. It offers unique opportunities for studying important aspects of HDV genome replication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasmid.

Beginning with a sequenced HDV cDNA (15), the ScaI-XbaI fragment containing the δAg open reading frame was inserted into pcDNA5/FRT/TO (Invitrogen). This vector has a hybrid human cytomegalovirus/TetO2 promoter for tetracycline-regulated gene expression. It also has an Flp recombination target (FRT) site for Flp recombinase-mediated integration.

Generation of 293-δAg, a cell line expressing the small form of δAg under TET-on control.

Human embryonic kidney cells, Flp-In T-Rex (Invitrogen), were used to generate a δAg expression cell line. The genome of this cell line has been stably transfected with two plasmids, one containing the FRT site and the other expressing a TET repressor. Transfection of this cell line was performed with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The plasmid containing the HDV sequence was cotransfected with pOG44, which expresses Flp recombinase. This cotransfection led to the integration of HDV sequence through the FRT site with its expression under TET-on control. Two days after transfection, cells were reseeded at less than 25% confluence. Two to 3 h later, selection antibiotics were added to the medium. Selection antibiotics, hygromycin and blasticidin (Invitrogen), were used to maintain both the δAg and TET repressor genes. Two weeks later, separate foci appeared, and the pool of such cells was expanded to generate what we refer to as 293-δAg cells. After TET induction, immunoblot and immunocytochemistry were used to confirm the expression of δAg in 100% of these cells. 293-δAg cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with high glucose and 10% fetal bovine serum along with the selection antibiotics mentioned above.

Transfection of 293-δAg cells with HDV RNA sequences to initiate HDV genome replication.

To initiate HDV replication, these 293-δAg cells under Tet conditions were transfected with a greater-than-full-length HDV RNA species. This RNA had a 2-nucleotide deletion at the unique EcoRI site, a change that interferes with the translation of a functional δAg (5). Using strategies described in the legend of Fig. 3, we consider that this transfection led to the replication and accumulation of HDV RNA in about 15% of cells. As one approach to achieve replication in more of the cells, total RNA was extracted from some of the cells and used to retransfect the culture. This cycle of retransfection was repeated as many as four times. The fraction of transfected cells was thus raised to ≈40%. As an additional approach, we carried out cell cloning under Tet conditions. We thus obtained clones, designated 293-HDV, with HDV replication occurring in all cells.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Immunocytochemistry of 293 cell cultures. The three rows show staining with DAPI, detection of δAg, and detection of SC35. Columns A and B represent 293-δAg cells that were transfected with HDV RNA maintained under Tet conditions and then TET induced for 2 and 14 days, respectively. Column C shows 293-HDV, a clone of cells that are replicating HDV RNA, as examined at day 2 after TET induction.

Quantitation of δAg and genomic RNA.

Tri Reagent (Molecular Research Center) was used to extract both protein and RNA. δAg was measured in protein samples by immunoblot followed by 125I-staph A protein (Perkin-Elmer) and detection by Bio-imager (Fuji). Quantitation was measured relative to a standard of purified recombinant δAg provided by Harmon Zuccola and James Hogle (Harvard University), as previously described (13). Genomic HDV RNA was detected by Northern analysis using a 32P-labeled specific RNA probe and quantitated relative to a standard of in vitro-transcribed HDV genomic RNA, as previously described (13). Detection and quantitation of radioactivity were done by using a Bio-imager (Fuji).

Immunocytochemistry.

The procedure was based on a method described previously (1, 14). As primary antibodies, for δAg, we used a 1:1,000 dilution of a rabbit polyclonal antibody; for SC35, we used a 1:2,000 dilution of a mouse monoclonal antibody (Abcam); and for fibrillarin, we used a 1:500 dilution of a mouse monoclonal antibody (Abcam). As secondary antibodies, we used a 1:500 dilution of Cy2-conjugated AffiniPure donkey anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (heavy plus light chains) and rhodamine red-X-conjugated AffiniPure donkey anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (heavy plus light chains) (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Cellular DNA was stained with DAPI (4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Sigma). Samples were analyzed using an Inverted Nikon TE2000-U microscope with 40× Plan ELWD, WD 3.7-2.7 objective, and specific filter blocks. Images were acquired with a Cascade 650 monochrome camera (Photometrics) and MetaVue software (Universal Imaging). Subsequently, images were processed with Canvas 9.0 and Adobe Photoshop 7.0 software.

Cell cycle and apoptosis analysis.

For 293-δAg and 293-HDV cells, both with and without TET induction, we used propidium iodide staining and analytical cell sorting with a Guava PCA apparatus (Guava Technologies) to determine the distribution of cells within the cell cycle. Data were analyzed using Flowjo software. Using the same apparatus together with a Nexin kit to stain for annexin V and 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) (Guava Technologies), we also assayed for various stages of cell death. Trypan blue was used as recommended by the supplier (Gibco).

RESULTS

Conditional expression of δAg in 293-δAg cells.

The first step in our strategy was to create a cell line conditionally expressing the small δAg. We used a commercially available engineered form of 293 cells, human embryonic kidney cells. These cells contain a single target site for the recombinase flp, into which vector sequences can be efficiently inserted. Furthermore, these cells express a protein that in the absence of TET will repress transcription from the transposed sequences. In this way, we transferred cDNA for the small δAg to create what we refer to as 293-δAg cells.

To test whether all cells were expressing δAg, we used immunocytochemistry with a δAg-specific rabbit polyclonal antibody. As shown in Fig. 1A, 2 days after TET was added at 1 μg/ml, all cells expressed δAg, with staining located predominantly in the nucleolus. This distribution was as expected from previous transient transfection studies (1).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Expression in the 293-δAg cell line. (A) Monolayer cultures at 2 days after the addition of TET were examined for staining with DAPI and by immunocytochemistry to detect δAg. (B) Immunoblots were used to detect δAg in cells before and after TET induction relative to a standard of recombinant δAg. We thus deduced the number of molecules of δAg per average cell. (C and D) A similar quantitation was made for cells that were exposed to added TET either for 3 days in the presence of varied concentrations of TET (C) or for varied times but with a single concentration of TET (1 μg/ml) (D).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Accumulation of replicating HDV genomic RNA in the 293-δAg cell line after transfection with HDV RNA sequences. To initiate HDV genome replication, cells were transfected with a linear antigenomic HDV RNA that was greater than unit length and contained a 2-nucleotide deletion to disrupt the open reading frame for δAg. As indicated, cultures were incubated in the presence (open circles) or absence (filled circles) of TET (1 μg/ml). Cells were routinely subcultured every 3 to 4 days. After 8 and 52 weeks, some cultures were shifted from the absence to the presence of TET. At the times indicated, total RNA was extracted and examined by Northern analysis to quantitate the amount of HDV genomic RNA per average cell.

Next, we used immunoblots to detect and quantitate δAg. As shown in Fig. 1B, in the absence of TET, there was a low amount of expression, about 40,000 copies per cell. However, after TET addition, the amount increased 60-fold, to 2.4 million copies. This high number approximates the abundance of host cell ribosomal components and many required translation factors (8).

As further characterization of these cells, Fig. 1C shows that 0.1 to 1 μg/ml of TET was sufficient to give maximal induction of δAg expression. In addition, Fig. 1D shows a time course of the induction for cells treated with 1 μg/ml of TET. Maximal levels were achieved within 2 days.

Initiation of HDV genome replication in 293-δAg cells.

The second step was to transfect 293-δAg cells with HDV RNA sequences. We specifically chose an HDV RNA with a 2-nucleotide deletion in a region that disrupts expression of δAg (4). That is, we wanted the integrated DNA copy of δAg cDNA to be the only and unchangeable source of this protein. At various times after transfection, we analyzed the RNA in these cells for replication and accumulation of HDV genomic RNA.

Consider first the situation, when these cells were maintained in the absence of TET. As shown in Fig. 2, the transfected cells achieved a low level of HDV genomic RNA, about 1,000 copies per average cell. As shown, this level was essentially stable for at least 1 year.

We next assessed HDV replication when TET was added to the medium. Figure 2 shows examples of when TET was added at 8 and 52 weeks after the initial RNA transfection. In both cases, a burst of HDV RNA accumulation was detected within 3 days. During the following weeks, we then observed significant detachment of cells from the monolayer. Furthermore, for the remaining cells, the amount of HDV RNA per average cell decreased dramatically so that by 2 to 3 weeks, no HDV could be detected. In contrast, for 293-δAg cells that had not been transfected with HDV RNA, we did not detect detachment of cells during 3 weeks of TET induction. Our preliminary interpretation of these data was that the initial HDV RNA transfection efficiency was less than 100%. Furthermore, it was considered that after TET addition, only those transfected cells that were replicating the HDV RNA were the ones that ultimately became detached from the monolayer. As now explained, this interpretation was supported by data obtained using immunocytochemistry.

As shown in Fig. 1A, we already knew that the 293-δAg cells all expressed δAg and that it was primarily localized to the nucleolus. However, when such cells transfected with the HDV RNA were subsequently induced with TET for 2 days, there were two different patterns of intranuclear distributions, as shown in Fig. 3A. More than half of the cells had the nucleolar distribution, while about 40% had a dramatic exclusion from the nucleolus together with a nucleoplasmic localization. This nucleoplasmic pattern included but was not limited to speckles, some of which colocalized with those that contain the splicing factor SC35 (16). This distribution is very much like that reported for replication of the HDV genome in Huh7 cells, where the staining was nucleoplasmic and included SC35 speckles (1). As shown in Fig. 3B, when we examined cells at 2 weeks after TET addition, the only cells staining for δAg had a nuclear pattern that was predominantly nucleolar. These data further support the interpretation that only a fraction of the cells were initially transfected with HDV RNA and that it was these cells that were being detached during the extensive TET induction.

To further establish these interpretations, we subcloned cells that had been RNA transfected and maintained for a long period in the absence of TET. Seventeen such clones were generated and tested by Northern analysis for HDV replication. Only six clones gave extensive HDV RNA accumulation when induced for 2 days with TET (data not shown). The other clones were negative for HDV RNA. Furthermore, when the induced clones were examined by immunocytochemistry, it was only with the HDV RNA-positive clones that we detected a pattern of δAg in the nucleoplasm and excluded from the nucleolus. Data for such a clone, designated 293-HDV, are shown in Fig. 3C. Note that all the cells had this nucleoplasmic distribution of δAg after a brief TET induction. (Without the induction, the distribution was the same, except that the signal was less intense [data not shown].)

An additional immunostaining experiment was used to compare the original 293-δAg cells with the clone 293-HDV interpreted as replicating the HDV. As shown in Fig. 4A, at 1 day after TET induction, all the nuclear δAg staining colocalized with that for fibrillarin, a marker for the nucleoli. In contrast, for 293-HDV cells, the δAg staining was nucleoplasmic but excluded from the sites of fibrillarin staining (Fig. 4B).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Immunocytochemistry of 293-δAg and 293-HDV cells. The three rows show staining with DAPI, detection of δAg, and detection of fibrillarin. Columns A and B show 293-δAg and 293-HDV cells, respectively, at day 1 after TET induction.

As a further characterization, we examined two of the 293-HDV clones for the accumulation of HDV RNA after TET induction. Figure 5 shows the average HDV RNA values for these two clones as a function of the time after TET induction, with the error bars representing the range of values. In other words, both clones were essentially the same in terms of HDV RNA accumulation. The HDV RNA levels reached 4.3 × 104 copies per average adherent cell, a value about twice that achieved prior to subcloning (Fig. 2). Also, the accumulation was prompt, reaching half-maximal values in less than 1 day. If we compare these data with the time course of accumulation of δAg during TET induction as presented in Fig. 1D, the results are very similar; that is, the levels of δAg and HDV RNA increase in parallel during TET induction.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Prompt accumulation of replicating HDV genomic RNA after TET induction of 293-HDV cells. Northern analyses were used to quantitate the average number of genomic RNA molecules accumulated per average adherent cell. The data are the averages for two different clones, with the error bars representing the range of the averaged values.

Next, we examined the consequences of TET induction on the viability of 293-HDV cells. As mentioned earlier, prior to subcloning, we did observe detachment of some cells following several days of TET induction (Fig. 2 and 3). Furthermore, we interpreted the 293-HDV cells but not the 293-δAg cells as being susceptible to such detachment. We confirmed this interpretation by observation of the cloned 293-HDV cells relative to 293-δAg at day 6 of culture with or without TET induction. As shown in Fig. 6, extensive detachment occurred for the TET-induced 293-HDV cells (Fig. 6B). In contrast, the 293-δAg cells showed no detachment (Fig. 6D). There was no detachment in the absence of TET induction (Fig. 6A and C).

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Comparison of the effect of TET induction of 293-HDV relative to that of 293-δAg. The two cell clones were seeded and then cultured for 6 days in the absence or presence of TET, as indicated. Charge-coupled-device images were taken using regular light microscopy with a ×20 objective.

Finally, we used several procedures in parallel to better compare the effects of TET induction on both 293-δAg and 293-HDV cells. Cultures were studied at days 1 to 4, as well as at day 6, when TET induction led to extensive cell detachment of 293-HDV cells. We counted adherent and nonadherent cells. Trypan blue staining was used to detect dead cells. Staining for annexin V and 7-AAD followed by cell sorting was used to detect stages of apoptosis. Finally, propidium iodide staining followed by cell sorting was used to detect stages of the cell cycle.

Overall, TET induction of 293-δAg cells had no effect detectable by these assays. However, for 293-HDV cells, TET induction began the following series of events. (i) Even by day 1, we could detect a reduction in the S- and G2/M-phase cells relative to G1/G0 by cell cycle analysis. (ii) By day 2, these cell cycle effects were dramatic, as shown in Fig. 7, with a fivefold reduction in S- and G2/M-phase cells relative to G1/G0. There was also a significant increase in cell debris. (iii) By day 3, the cell cycle blockage continued, and in addition, we could detect a 60% decrease in the total cell number relative to that of uninduced 293-HDV cultures. Also, about 6% of the total cells were no longer adherent. (iv) By day 4, the proportion of nonadherent cells increased to about 20%. This was at least 20 times more than that for uninduced 293-HDV cultures. (v) By day 6, virtually 100% of the cells were no longer adherent.

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7.

Cell cycle analyses of 293-δAg and 293-HDV cells. Data were obtained using propidium iodide staining followed by analytical cell sorting. This allowed separation of cells by DNA content as G1/G0, S, and G2/M, as indicated. Columns A and B refer to 293-δAg and 293-HDV cells, respectively, with data shown for cells both without and with 2 days of TET induction.

The adherent and nonadherent cells were also examined by staining for annexin V, 7-AAD, and trypan blue. Typical data for day 4 are summarized in Table 1. The data show that for all four culture conditions, the adherent cells were not significantly different in terms of these viability markers. Similarly, the nonadherent cells were also not significantly different. Thus, by these particular viability assays, the only specific difference for the TET-induced 293-HDV culture was in the dramatic increase in the fraction of cells that were nonadherent.

TABLE 1.

Viability assays of adherent and nonadherent cellsa

Cell line Positive staining of cells adherent/nonadherent (%)
Annexin V 7-AAD Trypan blue
293-δAg (Tet) 16/30 10/19 1/17
293-δAg (Tet+) 10/24 6/12 2/14
293-HDV (Tet) 16/27 10/16 0.5/12
293-HDV (Tet+) 15/36 8/22 2/15
a

Monolayer cultures of 293-δAg and 293-HDV cells were grown for 4 days in the absence or presence of TET, as indicated. The adherent and nonadherent cells were then assayed for the percentage of cells which stained positive for annexin V, 7-AAD, or trypan blue.

In summary, from these studies, we conclude that HDV genome replication in TET-induced 293-HDV cells was specifically interfering with cell growth, cell cycling, and finally, cell adherence. It was secondarily leading to cell death, some but not necessarily all of which was via apoptotic mechanisms; that is, HDV genome replication was indirectly cytotoxic. Others have previously shown that the loss of cell adhesion can lead to the onset of apoptotic cell death (17).

DISCUSSION

We have described here a novel system in which HDV genome replication was initiated by RNA transfection of a stable cell line, 293-δAg, that provided fully functional δAg under TET control. Following subcloning of these transfected cells, we were able to obtain populations of cells, designated 293-HDV, all of which were replicating the HDV RNA. An important concept of this system is that the replicating HDV RNA has a mutation so that it does not make any form of δAg. That is, this essential protein is provided solely from an integrated single-copy gene. Since the expression from this gene is under TET control, the replication of the HDV RNA is as well. It is important that even in the absence of TET, there is a low level of δAg expression and a corresponding low level of HDV RNA. This offers the advantage that HDV replication can be maintained in culture for at least 1 year. However, after the addition of TET, the levels of HDV RNA increase dramatically and almost in parallel with the increase of δAg (Fig. 1D and 5).

The persistence of replication for 1 year in the absence of TET allows us to conclude that such low levels of HDV replication are not significantly cytotoxic. This “chronic” replication is similar to the long-term replication of viroids in infected plants. In our system, just as for viroid replication, the replicating RNA encodes no protein and is totally dependent upon proteins provided by the host cell.

In contrast to the chronic HDV replication, induction of HDV replication with TET soon leads to the loss of cells efficiently replicating the HDV genome (Fig. 2). We show that this loss is associated with significant levels of detachment of cells from the monolayer (Fig. 2 and 6). In addition, from a cell cycle analysis at earlier times, we observed that most of the cells move out of S and G2/M into G1/G0 phase. Such effects are detectable at day 1 and dramatic by days 2 and 3 (Fig. 7 and data not shown). This cell cycle arrest leading to cell detachment and death is not dictated by the levels of the δAg, since 293-δAg cells show no such phenomenon.

For some time, it has been a controversial issue as to whether δAg alone or in conjunction with HDV genome replication causes cytotoxic effects in cultured cells (as reviewed in references 12 and 18). The observations of a cytopathic effect associated with HDV replication induced in 293-HDV cells reported here could explain a previous report where transient expression of HDV replication was shown to interfere with cell colony-forming ability (26). More importantly, our observations might provide an explanation of what happens in the liver during acute HDV infections of humans and experimental animals. It is known that during such acute infections, there are real cytopathic effects, ones that are not immunity mediated (12). In fact, as many as 20% of acute HDV infections of humans are associated with fulminant hepatitis and death (10, 24). While there could be multiple factors contributing to this, the death of 293-HDV cells is not due to the expression of δAg per se but is a consequence, direct or indirect, of extensive RNA-directed HDV RNA replication.

We consider that this new model has some important additional advantages for the study of HDV replication. (i) Replication no longer needs be initiated by a potentially disruptive procedure such as transfection or electroporation of DNA or RNA species but simply by the addition of TET. (ii) At the time of TET induction, the HDV RNA templates are predominantly unit length and circular (data not shown), and this is no doubt a major reason why the response of new HDV synthesis and accumulation can be so fast (Fig. 5). (iii) The levels of HDV genome replication and accumulation are extensive (4.3 × 104 copies per cell) and almost the same as those determined for the liver during an acute infection (≈6 × 104 copies per average cell) (6, 13).

This new model has already opened up for us the following three new areas of HDV research. (i) We have shown that in the absence of TET, HDV genome replication can be maintained for long periods of time (Fig. 2). It is essentially a form of chronic replication. It is worth noting that under these experimental conditions, the HDV genome is replicating in a manner analogous to the replication of viroids, which are minimal noncoding RNAs demonstrating autonomous replication in plants (9). In other words, for both our system and viroid-infected plants, the replication becomes chronic. We have already begun studies of the nucleotide changes that accumulate during extended HDV replication. We expect that a detailed examination of the time-dependent evolution of the HDV genome sequence will provide new clues as to what are essential sequences and structures.

(ii) Another application of our novel system is suggested by the rapid and extensive burst of HDV RNA-directed RNA transcription that occurs when TET is added (Fig. 2 and 5). In part, this speed is because the cells have not needed to suffer deleterious associated effects typical of other experimental systems where transfection is used to deliver RNA templates. Also, the HDV RNA templates already present in the chronic cells are “ready to go,” that is, unit-length circular RNAs (data not shown). In addition, there is only one form of δAg, the one essential for genome replication, and there are no variant forms of δAg, including large δAg, that might redirect some of the HDV ribonucleoproteins away from the replication pathway. Our system therefore offers unique advantages for studying the mechanism of HDV replication. Currently, we are using immunoaffinity procedures to isolate and characterize the HDV transcription complexes from such cells. We should be able to identify the host polymerase(s) and other components present in such complexes and maybe use such preformed complexes to characterize HDV RNA transcription in vitro.

(iii) The rapid and extensive burst of HDV RNA-directed RNA synthesis and accumulation that follows TET induction also allows us to test the action of antiviral agents. We can use periods of treatment so short that overall drug toxicity can be reduced or avoided. We are currently testing nucleoside inhibitors such as ribavirin.

In summary, we have described here a novel system for studying HDV genome replication, presented some results to support its value, and described examples as to how it will be used in the near future.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants AI-26522 and CA-06927 from the National Institutes of Health and by an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

We thank Harmon Zuccola and James Hogle for purified delta protein. For the imaging, we thank Irina Shchaveleva and the Fox Chase Imaging Facility (Sandra Jablonski, Manager). For the cell sorting, we thank Maureen Murphy and the Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting Facility (Richard Hardy, Manager). Constructive comments on the manuscript were given by Glenn Rall, Ju-Tao Guo, Richard Katz, and William Mason.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bichko, V. V., and J. M. Taylor. 1996. Redistribution of the delta antigens in cells replicating the genome of hepatitis delta virus. J. Virol. 70:8064-8070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Casey, J. L., and J. L. Gerin. 1995. Hepatitis D virus RNA editing: specific modification of adenosine in the antigenomic RNA. J. Virol. 69:7593-7700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chang, F. L., P. J. Chen, S. J. Tu, M. N. Chiu, C. J. Wang, and D. S. Chen. 1991. The large form of hepatitis δ antigen is crucial for the assembly of hepatitis δ virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:8490-8494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chao, M., S.-Y. Hsieh, and J. Taylor. 1991. The antigen of hepatitis delta virus: examination of in vitro RNA-binding specificity. J. Virol. 65:4057-4062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chao, M., S.-Y. Hsieh, and J. Taylor. 1990. Role of two forms of the hepatitis delta virus antigen: evidence for a mechanism of self-limiting genome replication. J. Virol. 64:5066-5069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen, P.-J., G. Kalpana, J. Goldberg, W. Mason, B. Werner, J. Gerin, and J. Taylor. 1986. Structure and replication of the genome of hepatitis δ virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:8774-8778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dingle, K., V. Bichko, H. Zuccola, J. Hogle, and J. Taylor. 1998. Initiation of hepatitis delta virus genome replication. J. Virol. 72:4783-4788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Duncan, R., and J. W. Hershey. 1983. Identification and quantitation of levels of protein synthesis initiation factors in crude HeLa cell lysates by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J. Biol. Chem. 258:7228-7235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Flores, R., S. Delgado, M. E. Gas, A. Carbonell, D. Molina, S. Gago, and M. De la Pena. 2004. Viroids: the minimal non-coding RNAs with autonomous replication. FEBS Lett. 567:42-48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gerin, J. L., J. L. Casey, and R. H. Purcell. 2001. Hepatitis delta virus, p. 3037-3050. In D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, et al. (ed.), Fields virology, 4th ed., vol. 2. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa.
  • 11.Glenn, J. S., J. M. Taylor, and J. M. White. 1990. In vitro-synthesized hepatitis delta virus RNA initiates genome replication in cultured cells. J. Virol. 64:3104-3107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gowans, E. J., and F. Bonino. 1993. Hepatitis delta virus pathogenicity. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 382:125-130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gudima, S. O., J. Chang, G. Moraleda, A. Azvolinsky, and J. Taylor. 2002. Parameters of human hepatitis delta virus replication: the quantity, quality, and intracellular distribution of viral proteins and RNA. J. Virol. 76:3709-3719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gudima, S. O., J. Chang, and J. M. Taylor. 2005. Reconstitution in cultured cells of replicating HDV RNA from pairs of less than full-length RNAs. RNA 11:90-98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kuo, M. Y.-P., J. Goldberg, L. Coates, W. Mason, J. Gerin, and J. Taylor. 1988. Molecular cloning of hepatitis delta virus RNA from an infected woodchuck liver: sequence, structure, and applications. J. Virol. 62:1855-1861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lamond, A. I., and D. L. Spector. 2003. Nuclear speckles: a model for nuclear organelles. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4:605-612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Law, S. F., G. M. O'Neill, S. J. Fashena, M. B. Einarson, and E. A. Golemis. 2000. The docking protein HEF1 is an apoptotic mediator at focal adhesion sites. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5184-5195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lazinski, D. W., and J. M. Taylor. 1994. Recent developments in hepatitis delta virus research. Adv. Virus Res. 43:187-231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Luo, G., M. Chao, S.-Y. Hsieh, C. Sureau, K. Nishikura, and J. Taylor. 1990. A specific base transition occurs on replicating hepatitis delta virus RNA. J. Virol. 64:1021-1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Macnaughton, T., and E. Gowans. 1995. Hepatitis delta antigen, p. 69-82. In G. Dinter-Gottlieb (ed.), The unique hepatitis delta virus. R. G. Landes Co., Austin, Tex.
  • 21.Modahl, L. E., and M. M. C. Lai. 1998. Transcription of hepatitis delta antigen mRNA continues throughout hepatitis delta virus (HDV) replication: a new model of HDV RNA transcription and regulation. J. Virol. 72:5449-5456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Netter, H. J., T.-T. Wu, M. Bockol, A. Cywinski, W.-S. Ryu, B. C. Tennant, and J. M. Taylor. 1995. Nucleotide sequence stability of the genome of hepatitis delta virus. J. Virol. 69:1687-1692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Reference deleted.
  • 24.Rizzetto, M., R. H. Purcell, and J. L. Gerin. 1980. Epidemiology of HBV-associated delta agent: geographical distribution of anti-δ and polytransfused HBsAg carriers. Lancet i:1215-1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Taylor, J. M. 2003. Replication of human hepatitis delta virus: recent developments. Trends Microbiol. 11:185-190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang, D., J. Pearlberg, Y. T. Liu, and D. Ganem. 2001. Deleterious effects of hepatitis delta virus replication on host cell proliferation. J. Virol. 75:3600-3604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wong, S. K., S. Sato, and D. W. Lazinski. 2001. Substrate recognition by ADAR1 and ADAR2. RNA 7:846-858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES