Table 2.
Characteristics of the relationship between measures of global cognition and dynamic/static balance
| First Author | Number of participants | Mean age | % Female | Balance task | Global cognition | Association |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global cognition and dynamic balance | ||||||
| Zhao, et al. [51] 2022 | 107 | 71.7 ± 5 | 70% | TUG | Mini-Mental State Examination |
NS r: 0.21 |
| Jovanovic, et al. [30] 2022 | 98 | 68.5 | 83.6% | TUG | Montreal Cognitive Assessment |
NS r: 0.125 |
| Abe, et al. [52] 2017 | 169 | 72.4 ± 4.8 | 47.3% | TUG | 5-Cog Battery |
S r: 0.371 |
| Kose, et al. [33] 2016 | 80 | 75.7 ± 5.8 | 45% | TUG | Mini-Mental State Examination |
NS 0.126 |
| Kwan, et al. [53] 2011 | 280 | 74.9 ± 6.4 | 42.8% | TUG | Mini-Mental State Examination |
NS r: 0.30 |
| Won et al. [39] 2014 | 164 | 66 ± 4.6 | 66.5% | FRT | Mini-Mental State Examination |
NS 0.168 |
| Tsutsumimato, et al. [40] 2013 | 59 | 88 ± 87 | 83% | FRT | Mini-Mental State Examination |
NS r: 0.07 |
| Woo, et al. [54] 2017 | 385 | 79.1 ± 2.9 | 64% | BBS | Mini-Mental State Examination |
S r: 0.485 |
| Muir-Hunter, et al. [46] 2016 | 24 | 76.18 | 100% | FABS | Montreal Cognitive Assessment |
S r: 0.510 |
| Global cognition and static balance | ||||||
| Imaoka, et al. [55] 2022 | 20 | 70.4 ± 4.9 | 45% | Postural sway | Montreal Cognitive Assessment |
NS r: 0.35 |
| Goto, et al. [56] 2018 | 79 M | 67.8 ± 5 | 0% | Postural Sway | Mini-Mental State Examination |
S r: 0.239 |
| Muir-Hunter, et al. [46] 2016 | 24 | 76.18 | 100% | Postural Sway | Montreal Cognitive Assessment |
S r: 0.510 |
| Won et al. [39] 2014 | 164 | 66 ± 4.6 | 66.5% | Postural Sway | Mini-Mental State Examination |
NS 0.022 |
| Zhao, et al. [51] 2022 | 107 | 71.7 ± 5 | 70% | SLS | Mini-Mental State Examination |
NS r: 0.08 |
| Abe, et al. [52] 2017 | 169 | 72.4 ± 4.8 | 47.3% | SLS | 5-Cog Battery |
S r: 0.338 |
| Tsutsumimato et al. [40] 2013 | 59 | 88 ± 87 | 83% | SLS | Mini-Mental State Examination |
S r: 0.19 |
| Bruce- Keller, et al. [49] 2012 | 50 | 74.2 ± 7.8 | 42% | Balance SPPB | Mini-Mental State Examination |
NS r: 0.20 |
| Rosano, et al. [50] 2005 | 2893 | 73.6 | 52% | SLS ratio | Mini-Mental State Examination |
S r: 0.17 |
No Number of participants, M male, F Female, Number reference of the study, TUG Timed Up and Go Test, FRT Functional Reach Test, TBT Tinetti Balance Test, BBT Berg Balance Test, FABS Fullerton Advanced Balance Score, SPBB Balance Score on the Short Physical Performance Battery. SLS Single leg stance time, mCTCIB Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance. NS Non-significant, S Significant, R correlation. Bolds are studies which had MMSE score > 24 as inclusion criteria